Session by session
- Session 36 · Ask & understandWeek 18
Define cup and not-cup examples
Evidence: a question, sketch or new vocabulary
- Session 37 · Build & designWeek 19
Train with clean empty-cup photographs
Evidence: a design draft, dataset or build
- Session 38 · ImplementWeek 19
Add a human-reviewed permission signal
Evidence: a working version, explained once
- Session 39 · Test & improveWeek 20
Test confusing objects without running a pump
Evidence: a test log with at least one failure
- Session 40 · Explain & reflectWeek 20
Explain why AI must not decide safety alone
Evidence: an individual explanation
- Teacher model viewer
- cup images
- LED switch station
Ten object trials, with safe refusal for three non-cup objects.
The AI suggests. A person checks and operates the hardware.
Completion needs the artefact, an honest test log, an individual explanation and no open safety or privacy issue.
Projects in the same block
- RoboticsG05-P05
Wire-Maze Challenge
A contact-based game that sounds when the loop touches the wire.
Sessions 21-25Builder and up - RoboticsG05-P06
Night-Light Model
A light-responsive model with a labelled input and output.
Sessions 26-30Builder and up - AIG05-P07
AI Answer Detective
An AI-answer audit separating supported, unsupported and unclear claims.
Sessions 31-35Builder and up - IntegratedG05-P08
Cup-Check Station
A tabletop permission prototype; a teacher decides whether dispensing may begin.
Sessions 36-40Builder and up
For school leadersChoose a starting point.
Build from evidence.
Pick the classes and a plan. We map the timetable, kit and safety checks with you, then pilot one class first.
- Prospectus and class-wise plan
- Kit and readiness check
- Pilot one class first
- Evidence at every milestone
Let's plan your pilot.
Share a few details and we will send the right plan for your classes.